From pit crews to project crews: What healthcare and construction teach us about delivering strategy
- lorenaflorian0
- Apr 21
- 3 min read
Updated: Apr 23

There is a powerful pattern emerging across industries.
From Formula 1, to healthcare, to construction, high-performing organisations are not succeeding because they have better strategies.
They are succeeding because they have better execution systems.

Case study 1: Great Ormond Street Hospital × McLaren F1
When execution saves lives
At Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), leaders identified a critical risk:
Transfers of critically ill children between units were inconsistent
Communication breakdowns were occurring
Role clarity was weak at the most critical moments
Sound familiar?
This is the same failure pattern seen in projects during stage transitions.

What they did
GOSH partnered with the McLaren Formula 1 team to study pit stop operations.
What they observed:
Every role precisely defined
Every movement choreographed
One clear leader at each moment
Zero tolerance for ambiguity
What changed
They implemented:
Structured transfer protocols
Clear accountability for decision-making
Checklist-driven readiness controls
Simulation-based team training
The result
Reduced clinical risk
Faster, more predictable transfers
Improved team coordination

The insight for project delivery
Most failures do not occur because of lack of skill.
They occur because of poor coordination at critical moments.
In project terms, these are:
Stage gates
Governance approvals
Handover between teams
Transition to operations
These are your “pit stop moments.”

Case study 2: Heathrow Terminal 5
When construction rewrote the rules of delivery
Now consider one of the most complex infrastructure projects ever delivered in the UK: Heathrow Terminal 5 (T5).
Historically, large construction projects suffered from:
Fragmented supply chains
Adversarial contracts
Misaligned incentives
Cost overruns and delays
The problem
Traditional delivery models created:
Siloed teams
Blame shifting instead of collaboration
Poor integration across contractors
This is the construction version of the strategy implementation gap.

The intervention: the T5 agreement
BAA fundamentally redesigned how the project would be delivered:
Integrated Team Model
Client, contractors, and suppliers operated as one team
Aligned Incentives
Shared risk and reward model
Focus on project success, not individual contracts
Clear Governance and Decision Rights
Rapid decision-making
Escalation paths clearly defined
Focus on Coordination Over Contracts
Less emphasis on legal protection
More emphasis on delivery outcomes
The result
Delivered close to schedule and budget
Significantly reduced disputes
High levels of collaboration across the supply chain
The insight for project delivery
T5 proved:
You cannot contract your way to success.
You must design your delivery system for success.

Connecting the dots: the real lesson
Across both case studies, the pattern is clear:
Dimension | Healthcare (GOSH × F1) | Construction (T5) | Project Delivery Insight |
Roles | Precisely defined | Integrated teams | Clarity removes friction |
Handover | Structured transfers | Coordinated interfaces | Transitions are critical |
Governance | Clear leadership | Defined decision rights | Speed + control matters |
System Design | Choreographed | Designed operating model | Delivery is engineered |
The hero framework: DELIVER
To operationalise these lessons, organisations need a system.
This is where the DELIVER model becomes critical.
The 5Ps applied
Purpose
Clear alignment to strategic outcomes
People
Defined roles, accountability, capability, culture
Practice
Governance, lifecycle controls, standardisation of ways of working
Platform
Tools, data, and AI-enabled insights
Performance
Measurement of value, not just activity
Why this matters more than ever
Modern project environments are:
More complex
More interconnected
More time-constrained
Traditional approaches struggle under:
Uncertainty
Ambiguity
Interdependencies
These are well-recognised characteristics of complex projects, where interactions and system behaviour can drive unexpected outcomes.

The shift required
Organisations must move from:
Delivery as activity → Delivery as a system
This aligns with the evolution of project management itself:
From process-driven to principle-driven
From outputs to outcomes
From control to value delivery systems
Practical actions for leaders
To apply these insights:
Redesign your “pit stops”
Strengthen stage gates and transitions
Standardise handovers
Clarify roles and decision rights
Eliminate ambiguity
Enable faster decisions
Integrate teams
Break down silos
Align incentives
Embed real-time performance insight
Move beyond static reporting
Introduce data-driven governance

Final thought
The surgeons at Great Ormond Street didn’t become better clinicians overnight.
The Heathrow T5 team didn’t suddenly become more capable contractors.
They became better coordinated systems.
And that made all the difference.


Start bridging the gap
If you want to move from strategy to successful delivery:
👉 Download the first 3 chapters of The Strategy Implementation Gap: https://www.pmlogic.com.au/sig-book
Closing reflection
How aligned are incentives, accountability, and governance across your delivery ecosystem and is this misalignment contributing to the reality that over 90% of complex or AI initiatives fail to scale or deliver sustained value?
You don’t need a better strategy.
You need a better way to deliver it.
Please contact one of the PMLogic team to find out how we can help you uplift your delivery capability.

.png)



Comments